20-year-old William Matthew Guthrie from Traveler’s Rest was arrested when it was found with multiple bite marks on it. Originally he tried to claim he just didn’t know how a baby in his care ended up nibbled on but after failing a lie detector test he fessed up.
Cops are saying a “bad relationship” led to the Greer stand off where one person was killed. I assume the police took a class in understatement.
A Simpsonville man named Brian Gilbert bit off the tips of a cop’s finger in Anderson. After being released from the hospital the officer began experiencing severe symptoms including abnormally low blood platelet count. He’s being treated with cancer drugs but so far no one knows what’s wrong with him. Gilbert is a registered sex offender.
Remember Audrey Grabarkiewicz? She’s the pre-school teacher who along her child molester friend Sarah Lindsay was caught hosting drug and sex parties where children went to get high and have sex with the two skank. Grabarkiewicz, or whatever her name is now since her husband divorced her, somehow beat the rap and got no jail time.
Of course she was only charged with contributing and not any sex crimes so I’ve always assumed she rolled on her pervert friend who had been charged with sex crimes where the victims were between 11-14.
Regardless of how that case went down I was surprised when a tipster told me that Audrey is now working as a babysitter for some other skank who allows the now down on her luck party girl to stay with her. I’m also told that the mother of the year who allows a woman who plied pre-teens with drugs and alcohol so her friend could molest them spends time “partying” with Audrey. You’ll apparently see them in the nightclubs together.
I found a forum page where some of the “sexts” she sends to guys (notice I didn’t say men) are available. The ones that aren’t x-rated anyway. A middle age woman who sends nude pics of herself to random dudes seems like a good choice for a babysitter. I urge anyone who knows this person to call CPS.
Gawker recently published an editorial claiming among other things that at least 20% of child molesters are exclusively oriented toward molesting children. Despite the fact that thy give no examples of such people they go on to make the astounding claim that we should feel sorry for them and worse that “progressives” should be comfortable allowing these degenerates to live next door to them.
I am working on an essay rebutting this sinister piffle for Red State but I’ve written about this before and am re-printing this article I wrote more than a year ago about the push to normalize sexual abuse and exploitation
An expert witness from the University of Montreal made this astonishing claim in front of a parliamentary committee debating a bill that would increase Canada’s punishment of pedophiles:
“Pedophiles are not simply people who commit a small offence from time to time but rather are grappling with what is equivalent to a sexual orientation just like another individual may be grappling with heterosexuality or even homosexuality,” emphasized Van Gijseghem.
“True pedophiles have an exclusive preference for children, which is the same as having a sexual orientation. You cannot change this person’s sexual orientation.” He added, however: “He may however remain abstinent.”
This claim is astonishing because Dr. Hubert Van Gigjseghem portrays himself as an expert in “extra-familial sexual abuse” and forensic psychology, yet he appears completely unaware of the actual classifications of child molesters. Few child abusers are exclusively attracted to children and those who are generally fall into the either the “mysoped” category – sadists who seek to harm children for sexual gratification – or the “fixated” child molesters whose interest in children is a symptom of pathological immaturity.
The vast majority of so-called pedophiles are “situational” offenders. These people have no real interest in children but for a variety of reasons prey on them for sexual gratification, mainly because children are easier victims to manipulate and control.
Leftists have long accepted the “orientation” argument from pedophiles, partly driven by their blind acceptance of the fraudulent Alfred Kinsey reports that were used to normalize adults molesting children and partly influenced by the “pro-choice” feminist culture which devalues children and sees them as objects that shouldn’t be allowed to get in the way of an adult’s interests. But increasingly, people on the right, especially libertarians, have also accepted this view of child sexual exploitation as an “orientation.”
But there is no “pedophile” orientation, as anyone who has read about a sexual abuse case can tell you.
Take the recent example of Steven Demink of Michigan. Demink posed as a psychologist named Dalton St. Clair online and used a male model’s headshot as part of the deception. It is alleged that using this fake profile, Demink targeted single mothers on the Internet, telling them to molest their own children (on video) as part of a form of ‘therapy’ he created. Several women did just that and sent the footage to him. So far a Virginia Beach woman named Rebecca Nail and a 31-year-old woman from Florida named Candice Miller have been charged.
There are several other women who haven’t been charged yet. All molested the children with the expectation that they would be able to date the fictional Dr. Dalton St. Clair. These women molested children, filmed themselves doing it and sent those images to a man they met online in a bid to win his affection.
What orientation is that? Are they “pedophiles” or simply situational offenders?
In 2008 Kendra D’Andrea ended up in court when it was found that she not only allowed her long distance trucker boyfriend to rape her 8-year-old daughter, but she filmed the attacks and participated in the rapes. It should be noted that her “pedophile” boyfriend maintained a sexual relationship with Kendra. Are either of these people, who used a child as an accessory to their sex life, simply oriented toward abusing children as foreplay?
Just a few days ago, a 25-year-old named Randell Duffell traveled from Alabama to South Carolina to have sex with a 14-year-old girl he met online. Is the 25-year-old preying on teens for sex differently oriented from you and me, or just morally bankrupt? Do we believe that Randell prefers young teens to grown women, or is it just easier for him to gain access to them?
The answers here are obvious. People who exploit children for sex are no different than rapists or thieves. Just as rapists aren’t “roughsexosexuals” and “chokeophiles,” the child molester isn’t a person sexually oriented toward children. They are criminals who feel a sense of entitlement to their own gratification. Children are preyed on because they are unable to do what adults can – refuse. Most supposed pedophiles participate in sexual activity with adults on a regular basis, abusing children when the opportunity arises.
The view of people who prey on children as “grappling” from a orientation they can’t control is at odds not just with accepted research but with the reality we can see with our own eyes in the hundreds of news reports we see every day. The danger of this view should be obvious: it minimizes the moral responsibility of criminals while shielding them from the harsh punishment and social ostracism that is the only real deterrence to these crimes.
Where city officials are dealing with a sex offender convention. Sex. Offender. Convention.
ALBUQUERQUE (KRQE) – A national convention about sex offenders is coming to Albuquerque to push for lighter punishment for sex crimes. But opponents, including Governor Susana Martinez, said we need the opposite.
Lloyd Swartz, 43, is president of the Reform Sex Offender Laws New Mexico. The husband and father is also a convicted sex offender.
In 1987, the then-17-year-old Swartz was convicted of sexual assault for an incident in Texas. He spent ten years on probation. But in 2000, New Mexico laws changed to force all sex offenders to register with the Department of Public Safety, even those like Swartz who served out his probation long before. Swartz will need to stay registered for another 13 years, nearly forty years after his “youthful mistake.”
“It is immoral to create laws that punish people in perpetuity even though they’ve served out their sentence,” said Swartz.
Next month, like-minded advocates from all over the country will come to Albuquerque to try to do just that.
They want to change sex offender laws to have the online registry only available to law enforcement. They’re also pushing to remove names of offenders once they complete their probation and to prohibit the state from forcing convicted offenders from registering retroactively.
“It’s a violation of human rights to continue to humiliate, tear down and destroy families forever,” said Swartz.
Reform Sex Offender Laws is a pedophile run scam organization with ties to NAMBLA and militant pedophiles. Yeah that’s right, there is a militant pedophile movement. It also has ties to the radical left and all you liberals out there who think Howard Zinn is a genius should note he signed on to support this movement. One of the movement’s goals is to stop the “demonization” of rapists and child molesters. Here’s a quote from their website:
Stop public vilification and demonization of sex offenders. Oppose the use in the media or by public officials of obviously pejorative language with regard to offenders. Label only actually violent acts as violent crimes – define violence simply and logically as a physical attack or threat that causes real harm.Use of the term “pedophile” should be extremely limited and accurate.Children should be defined as persons under the age of puberty.
So if your daughter hit puberty at 10 or 11 she’s no longer a child and the 35-year-old you catch trying to have sex with her isn’t a child molester. Makes sense.
And did you catch that “real” harm stuff? I guess a threat to do something fantastical like send a kid to Hell for not cooperating with an assault would be redefined as non-violent even though a threat is being used to coerce the child into sex. I’ve blogged about threats of that type before (like the Voodoo Rapist of White Plains) and it is a kind of violence to threaten things against people even if you and I know there’s no chance of that threat happening.
But anyways you can read up on R.S.O.L. over at this awesome website which keeps track of perverts and degenerates. I say at least in Greenville we don’t have a convention of these scum but South Carolina does have a chapter of R.S.O.L. run out of Chester. Here’s their contact info if you’re interested in discussing their positions with them:
South Carolina RSOL
Primary Contact: Lila L. Folster
Postal Address: 862 Pine Ridge Rd., Chester, SC 29702
Does this make you think civilization is at a real crossroads?
Looks that way. Despite media claims to the contrary the Occupy movement has never had a coherent message aside from the nebulous desire to “smash capitalism” while making demands that people continue to participate in capitalist enterprise in order to subsidize Occupiers lifestyles through the taxation of activities the Occupiers claim are immoral. Otherwise the movement simply tries to line up against whatever Americans in general believe. This time Occupy Oakland may have went too far for even the most rabid armchair revolutionary as they held a protest targeting a meeting of groups trying to stop human trafficking and child sexual exploitation:
On Wednesday, June 13, members of the Occupy movement protested against a conference dedicated to combatting child sex trafficking — thus, the Occupiers in essence were coming out in favor of one of society’s most loathsome moral crimes.
The protesters mostly were members of Occupy Oakland Patriarchy, a group within the overall Occupy movement tasked with overthrowing our civilization’s “patriarchy.”
The conference which so infuriated them was called HEAT Watch, short for the National Human Exploitation And Trafficking Watch Conference.
If there’s one issue that unites Americans of all political stripes, it’s the sexual enslavement of children. Whatever our opinions on other issues, we all agree that sex trafficking and the prostituting of children is an outrage and a tragedy. Thus, conference attendees included liberal, moderate and conservative politicians; progressive nonprofit organizations; law enforcement groups; religious leaders; and (according to the conference Web site) “social services, medical providers, mental health, education, probation, and community-based organizations.” In short: Everybody.
Everybody, that is, except Occupy Wall Street, who somehow found a way to oppose the abolition of child sexual slavery.
The picture above (courtesy PJ Media) illustrates two points about the protest. The first is that it is rich, White, sheltered suburbanites who make up such asinine protests – the very people who knowingly are accomplices to the sex slave trade through their patronage of sites like Backpage and CraigsList.
The second and more important point is that this woman, who knows that children don’t go willingly into prostitution and that the adults these conferences are talking about are being forced into it as well, is willing to tell a lie that keeps people in sexual servitude to make her political point. In other words these protesters are defending rape for profit operations targeting the most vulnerable because it fits in some nebulous political or cultural agenda they have. These protesters just don’t care about the victims or right and wrong.
Understand these protesters are claiming that we should do nothing when some pimp is selling a child to perverts. We should do nothing when illegals are kidnapped and forced into rape camps (they call them brothels) by gangs. But the rest of us are “exploiters” and greedy?
This isn’t just about politics. Our society is increasingly inundated with voices like this, people who claim child exploitation is no big deal, that children are sexual beings etc. Often these people are involved in groups that promote a pro-pedophile agenda but rarely do we see an example of pro-pedophilia activism as clear and open as this. These people were fighting to stop people from rescuing children from sexual servitude. Is that what our society has become?
Is this a left/right issue? Are we really now choosing sides on issues of rape and slavery? Where is the condemnation from the rest of Occupy? Where’s the press coverage? Where do we stand as a nation when our privileged, spoiled dregs are fighting for the “rights” of pimps and sex slavers to force women and children into prostitution?