A few days ago 20-year-old Patrick Tranter of Greer was caught in a prostitution sting where he was caught pimping out three underage girls. One of the girls was only 13-year-old.
From Fox Carolina:
Police said they performed the undercover investigation at a local business Friday where they arrested 20-year-old Patrick Tranter and found three minor-aged girls, two of whom were charged with prostitution. The two charged were 13-year-old and 16-year-old girls.
According to Tranter’s arrest warrants, the girls told police that Tranter helped them set up a website to promote them as prostitutes and also helped them work.
Tranter was also found waiting in the parking lot where the girls were arrested, police said.
I waited a couple of days to see more info come out but it seems like not a lot is forthcoming - especially from a local media that claims a man pimping out children is “helping” the children prostitute. But I’ve heard that the girls were using sites like Backpage and the sting was in a motel. I hear that Tranter actually comes from a pretty good family but they can’t be that good since he was pimping out children to perverts.
My buddy Apelila P’Cock posted htis story on the Pagans Against Child Abuse page and I don’t even know what to say. In Michigan a depraved psychopath orally raped an infant to death. He was the father of the 15-week-old victim.
From The Daily Mail:
A father has been found guilty of killing his 15-week-old daughter while he was orally raping her.
Steven Deuman Jr, 26, of Suttons Bay near Traverse City, was convicted of first-degree murder and aggravated sexual assault after jurors – who were subjected to disturbing testimony and photos – took less than an hour to convict him.
In August 2011, baby Evelynne Deuman was found in the bedroom of their mobile home bleeding from the nose, unconscious and not breathing.
Deuman wasted valuable time from the moment he found his baby daughter until he called an ambulance.
He later told her mother Natasha Maitland that she had choked on a used condom.
Throughout the trial, he maintained he put his daughter on the bed while he went outside for a cigarette. When he came back she was lying on the floor not breathing with the discarded condom in her mouth.
Subsequent tests showed the DNA on the outside belonged to the baby and on the inside belonged to Deuman.
Jurors also heard from witnesses who, as children, claimed they also were sexually abused by Deuman.
The defense attorney argued that his client was a proud father and that the mobile home they shared with ten other people was an ‘accident waiting to happen.’
He said prosecutors unfairly portrayed his client as an ‘unbridled sex fiend’.
Yeah seems pretty unfair when you’re painted as a sex fiend just because your baby was found dead with a condom with your semen jammed down it’s throat and injuries consistent with being orally raped.
Thanks for the nightmares, April!
Gawker recently published an editorial claiming among other things that at least 20% of child molesters are exclusively oriented toward molesting children. Despite the fact that thy give no examples of such people they go on to make the astounding claim that we should feel sorry for them and worse that “progressives” should be comfortable allowing these degenerates to live next door to them.
I am working on an essay rebutting this sinister piffle for Red State but I’ve written about this before and am re-printing this article I wrote more than a year ago about the push to normalize sexual abuse and exploitation
An expert witness from the University of Montreal made this astonishing claim in front of a parliamentary committee debating a bill that would increase Canada’s punishment of pedophiles:
“Pedophiles are not simply people who commit a small offence from time to time but rather are grappling with what is equivalent to a sexual orientation just like another individual may be grappling with heterosexuality or even homosexuality,” emphasized Van Gijseghem.
“True pedophiles have an exclusive preference for children, which is the same as having a sexual orientation. You cannot change this person’s sexual orientation.” He added, however: “He may however remain abstinent.”
This claim is astonishing because Dr. Hubert Van Gigjseghem portrays himself as an expert in “extra-familial sexual abuse” and forensic psychology, yet he appears completely unaware of the actual classifications of child molesters. Few child abusers are exclusively attracted to children and those who are generally fall into the either the “mysoped” category – sadists who seek to harm children for sexual gratification – or the “fixated” child molesters whose interest in children is a symptom of pathological immaturity.
The vast majority of so-called pedophiles are “situational” offenders. These people have no real interest in children but for a variety of reasons prey on them for sexual gratification, mainly because children are easier victims to manipulate and control.
Leftists have long accepted the “orientation” argument from pedophiles, partly driven by their blind acceptance of the fraudulent Alfred Kinsey reports that were used to normalize adults molesting children and partly influenced by the “pro-choice” feminist culture which devalues children and sees them as objects that shouldn’t be allowed to get in the way of an adult’s interests. But increasingly, people on the right, especially libertarians, have also accepted this view of child sexual exploitation as an “orientation.”
But there is no “pedophile” orientation, as anyone who has read about a sexual abuse case can tell you.
Take the recent example of Steven Demink of Michigan. Demink posed as a psychologist named Dalton St. Clair online and used a male model’s headshot as part of the deception. It is alleged that using this fake profile, Demink targeted single mothers on the Internet, telling them to molest their own children (on video) as part of a form of ‘therapy’ he created. Several women did just that and sent the footage to him. So far a Virginia Beach woman named Rebecca Nail and a 31-year-old woman from Florida named Candice Miller have been charged.
There are several other women who haven’t been charged yet. All molested the children with the expectation that they would be able to date the fictional Dr. Dalton St. Clair. These women molested children, filmed themselves doing it and sent those images to a man they met online in a bid to win his affection.
What orientation is that? Are they “pedophiles” or simply situational offenders?
In 2008 Kendra D’Andrea ended up in court when it was found that she not only allowed her long distance trucker boyfriend to rape her 8-year-old daughter, but she filmed the attacks and participated in the rapes. It should be noted that her “pedophile” boyfriend maintained a sexual relationship with Kendra. Are either of these people, who used a child as an accessory to their sex life, simply oriented toward abusing children as foreplay?
Just a few days ago, a 25-year-old named Randell Duffell traveled from Alabama to South Carolina to have sex with a 14-year-old girl he met online. Is the 25-year-old preying on teens for sex differently oriented from you and me, or just morally bankrupt? Do we believe that Randell prefers young teens to grown women, or is it just easier for him to gain access to them?
The answers here are obvious. People who exploit children for sex are no different than rapists or thieves. Just as rapists aren’t “roughsexosexuals” and “chokeophiles,” the child molester isn’t a person sexually oriented toward children. They are criminals who feel a sense of entitlement to their own gratification. Children are preyed on because they are unable to do what adults can – refuse. Most supposed pedophiles participate in sexual activity with adults on a regular basis, abusing children when the opportunity arises.
The view of people who prey on children as “grappling” from a orientation they can’t control is at odds not just with accepted research but with the reality we can see with our own eyes in the hundreds of news reports we see every day. The danger of this view should be obvious: it minimizes the moral responsibility of criminals while shielding them from the harsh punishment and social ostracism that is the only real deterrence to these crimes.
As Dr. Deborah Shurman-Kauflin, author of the excellent book Vulture: Profiling Sadistic Serial Killers, points out in her essay Importing Violence: The Danger of Immigration from Violent Cultures it behooves Americans to demand that immigrants from cultures where women are viewed as sexual object assimilate into our cultural norms. The “machismo” culture of Central and South America is one that specifically concerns her:
Over the past several years, the U.S. has seen a large influx of immigrants, both legal and illegal, from countries whose values are opposed to the rights guaranteed by the U.S. constitution. Specifically, there are large numbers of immigrants coming from countries that are misogynistic. These societies accord women little to no rights, and the idea of violence committed by men against women and children is not unusual.
First, take the concept of ‘rapto.’ This comes from Mexico where in some areas, it is socially acceptable for a man of any age to abduct a female of any age as long as long as he intends to marry her. That is right. Men can kidnap and rape females. This is acceptable in Oaxaca where the government continues to view rapto as a minor crime. One legislator even referred to this horrid violation as “romantic.” Lest anyone believe such garbage, note that 24 year old Mexican immigrant Eliseo Nunez snatched a 12 year old girl and took her to Mexico to fulfill his erotic desires. Isn’t that romantic?
The fact is that South American male attitudes toward females are often archaic and misogynistic. Thus it is not surprising that the U.S. is seeing more attacks against women and little girls committed by these immigrants. In August 2005, illegal immigrant Jose Ramirez from El Salvador was charged with the violent attack of a 15 year old girl who refused to respond when he whistled at her (Roh, 2005). Perhaps such primitive behavior stems from the homeland culture. El Salvador and Guatemala have had a string of unsolved brutal murders where young females have been abducted and cut apart. Authorities have found body parts, including heads scattered around. In one instance, two female heads were deposited right in front of a local police station, blood still oozing from the severed heads (Miles, 2003). Gangs are suspected in these crimes as it is often part of their initiation to kill.
One of the things she doesn’t touch on in her essay though is how children are sexualized in these cultures. In Mexico there are states where the statutory age is 12 for girls and in practice girls that are much younger are “married’ to adult men. Child molestation is not viewed the same way we view it in many parts of the world which is why we too often see stories like this:
Police in the Rio Grande Valley town of Rio Hondo arrested Juan Henoch Mejia on Wednesday and he has been charged with two counts of aggravated sexual assault of a child.
Police there say he not only molested two preschool-age girls — one three and the other four years old — but also allegedly forced them to drink his semen.
Cameron County court records state that the four-year-old complained to her mother of pain on Tuesday.
After a trip to the doctor, it was discovered that the girl had been molested. A doctor called the Cameron County Sheriff’s Office, and they soon identified Mejia as the suspect.
In his subsequent confession, Mejia allegedly said that the girls walked in on him while he was masturbating in his room, and that he decided to molest them at that point. He also allegedly confessed to forcing the girls to drink his ejaculate from a cup.
Mejia also has an immigration hold and reports are that he;s here illegally. However since the Obama administration is badly mismanaging their probably illegal “dreamer” program I’ll bet you Mejia quietly jumps bail and disappears once ICE is involved.
You mean bars let in minors, especially female minors, with the hopes that their binge drinking will not only line their pockets but attract middle age perverts who like to take advantage inexperienced, unsupervised children and teens? Who could have seen that coming?
GREENVILLE, SC (FOX Carolina) – Several popular downtown Greenville bars and restaurants were cited Friday during an undercover alcohol compliance check, according to police.
Lt. Jason Rampey with the Greenville Police Department said officers went to 12 businesses to make sure they were not selling alcohol to underage drinkers, and to see if they were in compliance with the state’s drinking laws.
Six of the Central Business District locations sold alcohol to an undercover operative.
Catama Bar and Grill, Pomegranate, Compadre’s, The Nose Dive and Liberty Tap Room all on South Main Street were cited. Dixie’s Tavern on East North Street was also cited during the operation.
I have to be honest and say I did not see Pomegranate getting caught up in this coming. The other places are no surprise.
Especially in a recession bars look at decreased revenue from working folk and retirees so bringing in people who a) are not spending their own money and b) are not yet mature enough to moderate their behavior is essential. College kids spend their parent’s money and where college kids go high school kids follow. While those kids are throwing around their parent’s money the bars benefit from adults who are looking to swoop in on young, dumb and almost unconscious co-eds. Any bar will get very high traffic if they have people who get drunk and think things like this are a good idea:
Now not to nay say the good work of Greenville police but while they’re cracking down on underage drinking I know of several people who have reported child sexual trafficking on Backpage (including me) and cops have yet to do anything about that.