Hilarious – Filthy Pervert Daniel Torroll Blames A.D.D. for his Doll Molesting Shenanigans

On August 11th a music teacher from Tennessee named Daniel Torroll was fond by police naked on the property of an elementary school. He was in the process of having sexual relations with a “child-like” doll he had “cut holes into” I take to mean he had made himself a pedophile version of a Real Doll. It’s painfully obvious what he was doing – acting out his fantasy of raping one of the children from that school. But like all perverts Torroll thinks he’s smarter than you, me, the police and everyone else. He’s claiming that he’s not a pedophile at all. He has Attention Deficit Disorder which he claims makes it hard to resist sexual impulses.

Here’s an impromptu interview he did with a reporter on this situation. Notice that though he claims he can’t control his impulses he also claims that he can control impulses that would land him in prison. Not to politicize this, but you’ll also notice that after being found naked with a child size doll he was nailing in public the music teacher says it’s “unfair’ for the news to cover the story. Sounds like someone thinks that there shouldn’t be consequences to his own behavior.

I guess it would also be “unfair” to mention that on his now defunct website he claimed to work at a Montessori school who told reporters they never heard of him. That seems more like a clear scheme to pad out his resume so parents will trust him than “A.D.D.” but I’m no therapist.

The news report covering this story points out something Torroll left out. This happened on the first day of school. And Torroll seems to do all his teaching of children at his house which he calls the “Danny Torroll Skool of Music and Art” which had a website that was pulled down. Any of this sounding A.D.D. related?

Comments

74 Responses to “Hilarious – Filthy Pervert Daniel Torroll Blames A.D.D. for his Doll Molesting Shenanigans”

  1. Kelsey on August 12th, 2011 5:43 pm

    Dear inhuman, prejudice, judgmental SOB’s that wrote this,I have attended The DTSkool for about two years. NEVER have I had any unnatural abuse from Daniel. I have never been one to agree with society, but whoever wrote this, Publisher Rob Taylor, should have their rights suspended. Sure this is freedom of speech, but do we really need to ruin an innocent man with problems of his own with publicizing his faults? What if someone did this to you? I’m sure you would feel it was unfair. Like I said, I have been a student to Daniel for two years, Personally know his kids, (daughter, and son,) and personally know Danny better than most people would. Including you. ADD is different to everyone. Cases are mild to extreme, and Danny happened to be in the wrong place at the wrong time. And I would gladly stand up for him at any given moment. Until you do your research on his background and thought process, why don’t you check to see if your problems are being checked on. Clearly, you have some issues that need to be worked out. I will say this a thousand times, Daniel Torroll is a very talented man who has had to deal with Society and his own problems at once. And as he and I both know, You people are what makes society so unbearable. Good day to you. I hope you realize who you have harmed, congratulations.

  2. Rob Taylor on August 12th, 2011 7:31 pm

    So this guy goes to fuck a sex doll he made that looks like a child ON THE FIRST DAY OF SCHOOL and I’m the bad guy? Are you serious?

    What abou the lies he told about being affiliated with a Montessori? That’s unfair to publicize too?

    I mean how retarded do you have to be to not understand that Daniel is the one who ruined his life. There is no ADD that makes you turn children’s toys into sex aids and none that makes you fuck that toy near where elementary kids are.

    Why isn’t he responsible for his own actions? Are you saying that people should be able to do anything and their friends and neighbors are simply not allowed to know? A wife has no right to know her husband is cheating? Your parents have no right to know if you shoot heroin? Your parents who pay for your lessons have no right to know this douche claims he can’t control his sexual impulses? Grow up kid and stop being a sucker.

  3. steve J on August 12th, 2011 8:19 pm

    Danny Torroll is a musical genious..he also has friends who are attorneys and you can expect to hear from them for not getting your facts straight..

  4. Rob Taylor on August 12th, 2011 8:36 pm

    Yes, yes he’s a musical genius who teaches children at his home while lying about his employment with a Montessori. More like he’s some pot head man child who thought he could get away with being a pervert by claiming he’s a victim of something.

    I’ll sue him if he sues me – not for anything in specific just to keep him in court long enough to break him financially. At least that will distract him from his degeneracy.

  5. steve Jamison on August 12th, 2011 10:15 pm

    People like you are nothing but bottom feeders..didn’t you see that the police searched his home and found absolutely nothing that indicates he is the type of individual you make him out 2 be..people like you get their kicks from damaging others reputations and fabricating things..he has taught for years in Nashville and has never had a complaint or accusation from any of the kids he has taught..do all the investigating you want..they won’t find anything..so go onto the next person you want to trash pal.

  6. Rob Taylor on August 13th, 2011 12:52 am

    So you’re saying that there’s no evidence that a man ho waited until the first day of the school year to go onto the property of an elementary school and fuck a child sized doll he cut holes into is a pervert? Really? That’s your argument? That’s where you want to be on this?

    Did the news and the Montessori lie about him using false information too? C’mon.

    And the fact that they found no child porn on his computer is nice, but he FUCKED A CHILD SIZED DOLL ON AN ELEMENTARY SCHOOL PROPERTY ON THE FIRST DAY OF SCHOOL. Use your fucking heads. I eat frozen yogurt because i really want ice cream but since I’m getting older my metabolism is slowing down. Why does a person have sex with a child sized doll surrounded by trappings of children? And don’t give me the ADD – lots of people have it, supposedly. I’m saying why is this his specific behavior and how could you not be disturbed by his teach children after this?

  7. Samantha on August 13th, 2011 1:35 am

    My child attends Adale. I had the opportunity to watch this gentleman being escorted out from under the bridge as I drove by yesterday. (just to clarify, there was not a crowd- I was literally driving by)

    Rob, The guy is indeed a perv. There were lots of kids walking over the bridge while he was under there. he knew EXACTLY what he was doing. Indeed, if he and Barbie needed a date night, and it had NOTHING to do with the living, breathing kids scampering above him, he would have stayed home and been creepy in his own house. Good to hear that someone gets it. At some point the doll wouldn’t cut it anymore and he would want an upgrade, that’s how these things go.

    Steve, Good thing he has friends who are attorneys, uncle “Danny” may need them.

    Kelsey, I marched to my own drummer too. Well done standing up for something… or someone you believe in. But I’m actually a bit concerned at how emotionally you defend your teacher. It certainly appears that he has not crossed an obvious line with you. But you mentioned that he has “problems of his own” and you seem to know things about his “background”. I am curious why. If he is telling you sad stories about how he never fit in, if he is gaining your trust, if he is teaching you ideas in addition to music, then he is too close to at least one student. Also, you mention researching someone’s thought process. The problem is, that is not possible. The problem is….we don’t know what is going on in his head. So we have to go on what we know to be true (this is how we assess anyone).
    I get it, he is cool and unique and talented. That is what you know to be true. But you know now that he is more that that. He lied about his experience and he has dangerous tendencies.

  8. BJ on August 13th, 2011 1:57 am

    Amen! doesn’t the first response stick out to anyone? She writes “Dear inhuman, prejudice, judgmental SOB’s that wrote this, i have attended the DTSkool for about two years. Never have I had any unnatural abuse from Daniel.” UNNATURAL?! whats natural? Please explain. I know Danny, and his students. He also plays music with some of my friends from time to time. I always had a funny felling about him, now I just know.

  9. Chuck on August 13th, 2011 2:50 am

    I too suffer from ADD, and I have lost track of how many times I’ve been overwhelmingly compelled to cut holes in a doll and go fuck it in front of an elementary school. My mind just wanders, and before I know it, I’m back in the saddle again. This is very common, and I can’t understand why people want to make something dirty out of it.

  10. Rob Taylor on August 13th, 2011 12:00 pm

    Sam and BJ – Exactly. I suspect there’s something inappropriate about that relationship even if it’s just a grown man taking a child as a confidant. But the “unnatural” abuse line sounds like something perverts say to differentiate their abuse form other “worse” perverts.

    Chuck – I guess we’re just puritans.

  11. steve Jamison on August 13th, 2011 12:11 pm

    Rob, in my book you aren’t any better than Danny..You have no clue what Danny was thinking..yet you say he was fantasizing the rape of a child under a bridge..prove that Rob..you are in the trashing reputation business..and therefore I put you in the stink
    business..pretty smelly..as in disposed of like garbage..get a life!

  12. Rob Taylor on August 13th, 2011 12:17 pm

    Well argued.

    Are you really saying that cutting holes in a child sized doll to fuck doesn’t speak for itself? Did you read the comment of the mother up there?

    But yeah, I’m the bad guy. We’ll see when he gets caught out there. His student in these comments seems a little too into him – what do you think?

  13. P.W. Herman on August 13th, 2011 1:07 pm

    Looks a bit like Danny’s found this site and directed his minions to come and “explain” that Danny performs no “unnatural abuse” on anyone or anything except dolls and that you just can’t understand ADD and he’s a musical genius and you need to analyze his thought processes and he was just in the wrong place at the wrong time, much like an auto accident and the doll just fell out of the sky and onto his penis underneath a bridge and it happens, you know and is this going to be on the news?

    Then again, it could be Danny himself based on the run-on style of ranting that is characteristic of his speaking in the various TV news clips. There was always some kind of bluster and boasting about his latest hustle. Before you know it, he’ll claim he was trying to raise awareness on the first day of school for ADD Causing Music Teachers To Have Sex With Dolls Under A Bridge and it was all just performance art for a good cause, really it was.

  14. DodiaFae on August 13th, 2011 1:14 pm

    OMGs…
    So he was screwing a 2″ tall “doll” that he’d cut holes into… my 4 year old is taller than 2″. Nothing about that is ADD related, but has everything to do with pedophilia. Sorry, dear friends of Daniel Torroll, but he’s clearly a pedophile. If he weren’t interested in toddlers (seriously, 2″ tall???) he would have gotten an adult-sized blow-up doll, rather than going to the effort of getting a child-sized doll and cutting holes in it. Are you defenders really that fucking stupid? Seriously? If nothing else, do you really think we’re that stupid?

  15. DodiaFae on August 13th, 2011 1:21 pm

    OK, started reading the comments, and I’m seeing a lot of people excusing his actions in the same breath as claiming he’s a “musical genius”… Sounds like more of the “Roman Polanski is an artistic genius! So what if he raped a 13 year old child!” nonsense.

    Clearly he planned to “molest” this toddler-sized doll, then claims that it’s an impulse control issue. Sounds to me like he’s just setting up for when he’s caught molesting a real child. “Sorry, couldn’t help myself! It’s my ADD acting up again!” Bullshit. Not only should he not be allowed anywhere near any school, but his children should be removed from his “care” for their protection. Sadly, that’s not likely to happen until some poor child comes forward after having suffered at his hands.

  16. steve Jamison on August 13th, 2011 1:23 pm

    LOL!! Danny Torroll has never harmed a child and if he has then I will be the first one to eat humble pie…I have had a couple children take lessons fronm him and never has any of them said that he was inappropriate in any way shape or form..he never made a comment that could even be deemed questionable or inappropriate..Does Danny need help? Absolutely..Is he a child predator? No way..Best thing to do? Pray for him…Don’t trash him!

  17. P.W. Herman on August 13th, 2011 1:23 pm

    It’s astonishing that he would have defenders here, obviously kids who are unable to form coherent thoughts, oddly enough, like their mentor (just coincidence, I’m sure), and their parents are just peachy with all of this. Then again, plenty of parents shipped their kids off for sleepovers at Neverland, so anything is possible.

    But to insist that somehow the blogger is “trashing” Danny’s reputation? Really? Stripping nude and screwing a doll underneath a bridge on the very first day of school with kids overhead, by any objective standards, Danny’s not trashing his OWN reputation? Kid, you’re a total moron. How many times have you been held back or do they just shove you along? Good luck with the world. You’ll need it.

  18. DodiaFae on August 13th, 2011 1:28 pm

    @ Samantha – Glad to know that there are other moms out there that know the grooming tactics of a pervert when they see or read about them. Kudos.

    @ Kelsey – Please pay close attention to the words of wisdom shared by Samantha. She says these things to you out of concern for your well-being. A guy who is having sex with a toddler-sized doll below a busy walkway filled with small children obviously has no such concerns for children.

  19. steve Jamison on August 13th, 2011 1:32 pm

    The blogger is telling us in detail what Danny is thinking as if he were able to mind read which is slanderous..anyone who could write that Danny Torroll was under a bridge because he was fantasizing about raping a child should be held in high question..love to see him prove that in a court of law especially with no prior criminal history in 56 years! Anyone that familiar with “the fantasy world” is capable of committing the same act :)

  20. DodiaFae on August 13th, 2011 1:43 pm

    Steve, are yous serious? Do you know anything about the grooming process of child rapists? Do you know that the majority of cases are never reported? Of the many, many people I know, personally, that were sexually abused as children, only ONE of them ever reported the incident. One child of many. I learned of all the other incidences only after the victims/survivors reached adulthood. So you may want to take your children to a counselor who is experienced in working with children who may have been sexually abused, just to be sure.

  21. DodiaFae on August 13th, 2011 1:47 pm

    Steve, please go look up the definition of “slander”. In a court of law, all that would be required is “reasonable doubt”. I doubt any reasonable person being informed of what transpired would doubt for an instant that Danny is a pervert who was fantasizing about children, or that this was anything in the way of “spontaneous”. He clearly planned this. It would have taken him no more effort to go into an adult “toy store” and buy an adult-sized blow-up doll than it did for him to acquire a toddler-sized doll and cut holes in it. I’d say “think about that”, but clearly you’re incapable of much in the way of thinking.

  22. steve Jamison on August 13th, 2011 1:56 pm

    Whatever Doddie..you are obviously as pathetic as other quick to judgement people who are in the trashing business…the type of person who loves this stuff because it makes them feel better about themselves :)

  23. Rob Taylor on August 13th, 2011 2:39 pm

    Danny wasn’t under a bridge fantasizing – he was fucking a doll in view of children.

  24. steve Jamison on August 13th, 2011 3:03 pm

    Funny Rob..you stated exactly what Danny was fantasizing about in your blog..you must be a psychic or someone who has had experience with these fantasies..and funny Rob how nobody saw him doing this purported act-no children included..hundreds of yards from the school.. and funny Rob that Danny has always enjoyed the company af adult females including his current relationship..and funny Rob how there is no evidence whatsoever that Danny has ever been a pedophile despite teaching hundreds of children over the years..and funny Rob that his own children have never had anything but an adoring Dad..they are both in elementary school,,and funny how the police haven’t had any kids come forward since this story broke about being abused by Danny..and funny Rob that Danny has no prior criminal history..and funny Rob that the police found absolutely nothing at his house including computer-that indicated he was a pedophile or perv…you want “reasonable doubt” man I would have a field day in court over this one :)

  25. Rob Taylor on August 13th, 2011 3:11 pm

    I am actually a well known psychic or “spiritual worker” as we say.

    But to your points as I have written in many places “pedophiles” are not attracted only to children, most in fact are not really attracted to children at all but molest them because they’re easy targets.

    http://www1.csbsju.edu/uspp/CrimPsych/CPSG-6.htm

    http://www.red-alerts.com/born-bad/pedophilia-is-not-a-sexual-orientation-some-thoughts-on-the-bbcs-coalinga-treatment-center-report/

    I frankly believe that Danny is a drug addled immature degenerate seeking perverted thrills. The trail will confirm my belief and that is my prediction – and that gold will hit $5000 in 2012.

  26. steve Jamison on August 13th, 2011 3:33 pm

    I can agree with the drug addled and immature part..anything else at this point is nothing but speculation..Gold @ 5000..seems to me you think the American economy is going into the abyss..can you clarify why you think gold is going to 5000?

  27. Rob Taylor on August 13th, 2011 3:42 pm

    Like I said I’m psychic. But just look at inflation as calculated before they took food and fuel out. By the old standard we’re in double digits already.

    But there’s no speculation that Danny knew it was possible children might have seen him, no? He could have done this the day before school opened after all.

  28. DodiaFae on August 13th, 2011 3:59 pm

    He also could have done this in the privacy of his own home. He could have done this in the privacy of his own home with an adult-sized blow-up doll. But he did it out in public, under a bridge where a bunch of little kids were walking to school. I mean, really. Why else would he “only be taking his dog for a walk” and carrying a 2″ doll with holes cut out with him? Sorry, your arguments, “Steve”, are an epic fail… as are Danny’s claims that this was a spontaneous act brought on by ADD.

  29. Rob Taylor on August 13th, 2011 4:01 pm

    Exactly Dodia. Danny wanted kids or parents to see him and maybe “mistake” the doll for a real kid. That was likely his thrill.

  30. Keir on August 13th, 2011 5:07 pm

    DodiaFae- was the doll 2″ or 2′? My old star wars dolls were bigger than 2 inches. 2 feet can be explained away given the economy at the moment; they’re a good deal cheaper than the life-sized models. Maybe he’s into dwarves? Have you a problem with that? But that must be an hell of a school to climb over the fence and not know by the basketball courts and swings that children are near.
    Seriously, if you brush this off you can explain away anything. But only if you keep changing your name and never have the guts to provide an email address or link.

  31. steve Jamison on August 13th, 2011 6:09 pm

    I guess we will find out Doddie..if there is a trail I am wrong..if there is not you are an epic fail..one who is quick to judgement based on pure speculation-I am speaking from a legal perspective..

  32. steve Jamison on August 13th, 2011 6:13 pm

    …and yes Rob, from a legal perspective to say that Danny knew there might be children who could see him is pure speculation..especially when there was not a child within 300 yards of him..

  33. Rob Taylor on August 13th, 2011 6:19 pm

    So you’re saying you literally believe that Danny Torrell just didn’t know children and parents would be around? That he didn’t know he was on school property? That he isn’t a danger to the community even though he wants to FUCK DOLLS IN PUBLIC? C’mon. He might be your friend but you know better than that. What he admitted to doing was vile and clearly has a component of sexual hostility toward children or perhaps toward the community.

    Think of it this way – if this was a performance art piece what would the message be, and is that message one you would support?

  34. P.W. Herman on August 13th, 2011 6:37 pm

    “steve Jamison” = Danny Torroll

  35. Rob Taylor on August 13th, 2011 6:40 pm

    I think you called it P.W.

  36. steve Jamison on August 13th, 2011 8:35 pm

    Actually I am in agreement with a lot of people..including the first post..Rob Taylor=inhuman, prejudice, judgmental, SOB, who is a bottom feeder at best :)

  37. Rob Taylor on August 13th, 2011 8:59 pm

    So being grossed out by perversion makes you inhuman and judgmental? Interesting. At what point do you think people are “allowed” to make judgements about others? When they kill someone? Rape someone?

    Aren’t you being judgmental here?

    How exactly is this commentary on a public case hurting anyone? If Danny didn’t want to be ridiculed in public why would he nail a doll on the property of an elementary school.

    I noticed that you respond to none of those questions. I take it that your argument revolves around the notion that no matter what a person does we shouldn’t judge them. Except for me of course.

  38. steve Jamison on August 14th, 2011 12:25 am

    What Danny Torroll did showed extremely poor judgement..However, some of your insinuations show you are nothing more than a trash artist..you claim you are a “psychic and spiritual worker..” and then you feel you can just make things up out of thin air and say they are truth which in my book makes you a low life..you make statements that danny is a pedophile who was fantasizing about raping a child…that he was in full view of kids, without knowing the facts..first of all if you go to this bridge it is so far away from the school you would not even begin to think it is on school property..secondly-there is no way anyone could have seen Danny below the bridge it is covered in underbrush..thirdly-he was arrested at 9am when kids were already in school..no child could have possibly seen him…Having known Danny I am very disappointed in his behavior and believe he needs help. However, I do not believe he is a pedophile..ruining someone completely through false insinuations without a chance to defend themselves is pathetic..you are no better than him in my opinion. And yes I do believe in judgement..in this case Danny was given a citation and let go by the Police…he wasn’t even arrested! Doesn’t sound like a pedophile 2 me..

  39. Rob Taylor on August 14th, 2011 1:28 am

    Pedophiles are often not arrested. That’s how they molest people. But as I said before i don’t believe pedophilia is an orientation like you’re describing. Most child molesters are opportunists. That’s why I linked to some articles on that subject.

    So he’s not fantasizing about a child? So what is he thinking about when banging a child sized doll on elementary school property where children are already inside as you pointed out. Why didn’t he do this at home?

    The second burrito I ate for dinner was poor judgement. What Danny did was vile, vulgar and unacceptable in civilized society.

  40. Samantha on August 14th, 2011 10:00 am

    Thin Air vs. Facts:

    Okay, its not directly in front of the school, but its close enough that I parked on it at the last school function. and kids who walk to school cross that bridge to get to the entrance. No, Danny and his doll were not in the school lobby. So no problem then, right? (IQ level needed to understand=52)

    Oh, but someone obviously did see him, and they called the police. I was in the school office when the call came in with his description. If he hadn’t have been seen, he wouldn’t have been caught. (IQ level needed to understand=70)

    He was arrested at 9AM. We agree on this point, no child could have seen him being “arrested”. Again, I was there when the call came in at 8:45, school started at 8:35. I wouldn’t say it is making things up out of thin air to assume that Danny was there while the kids were walking to school 15/20 minutes earlier. (IQ level needed to understand=100…this one is slightiy higher due to the need to grasp the concept of time and how it works)

    You are killing me here. You said he was arrested at 9 and then in the next electronic breath that he wasn’t even arrested. In any case, whatever consequences the law deems appropriate is not what determines if Danny is dangerous! Do you get that? We live in a country with concrete laws and a constitution. A country that protects its citizens, even the creepy ones. As parents we are still charged with assessing everything around us and making a judgment on if it is or is not safe for our kids. This includes how many times a week we allow them to eat fast food, if we let them play on a sketchy looking swing set AND if we think someone who did what Danny did is a safe person. We are still expected to think! Simply because the government didn’t remove the sketchy swing set does not make it any safer to play on. As sick as this was, no laws were broken that would have sent Danny to jail…this time. But that doesn’t mean we should shut our brains off.

    Please stop with the nonsense about what is legally true, or able to be proven in a court of law. That has nothing to do with actual truth. Your semantics and manipulation of details is frightening. What Danny was doing was sick and disturbing. (please see Burrito reference for an example of poor judgment) This is most likely not the first time Danny has done something weird. The only good thing that has come out of this is that Danny is less dangerous to our kids today than he was last week, because now we know.

  41. Rob Taylor on August 14th, 2011 12:23 pm

    Very well put Samantha. But I get the feeling many of these Danny defenders are Danny himself.

  42. steve Jamison on August 14th, 2011 4:07 pm

    You may be right Samantha…However, I have a legal background
    I can tell you there is a whole lot of speculation in your arguments. You are right,
    Danny was not arrested..he was issued a citation and let go..he continues to say that he was walking his dog and needed to use the bathroom..the bridge is a good 500 yards from the school and if you didn’t know any better you would think it was not close to school property. The call came into the police of a suspicious man walking down to the creek bed after school started..the police responded within 5 minutes..therefore there were no kids walking over the bridge..Danny was with his dog..as I said before Danny is guilty of using very poor judgement..otherwise the police would have arrested and booked him..instead they let him go..iq needed for this (131)

  43. Rob Taylor on August 14th, 2011 5:05 pm

    So you’re saying the police were lying when they said he was buck naked and getting it on with a doll? And Danny, who admitted on camera that he was in fact doing exactly what police claimed was lying to reporters?

    In most places you don’t get arrested for crazy stuff – you get ticketed. That doesn’t mean you’re not guilty. People with dime bags on them usually get a summons and a ticket. So what? Does that mean they don’t use drugs?

    Do you even know what speculation means? Samantha is saying she witnessed certain things, other facts we’re talking about are admitted to by this pervert. The only speculation is to why he might have done this – but frankly I call that deductive reasoning not speculation.

  44. Jaime Gearle on August 14th, 2011 6:47 pm

    Seriously….WTF?? He is not a pervert? He is a musical genius? You are a moron (Steve J.)! The freak took his doll to the school….FACT! The police released pictures, He modified this doll FACT! again the police released the pictures, he was NAKED at the school FACT! (so far Steveo am I wrong on the facts that you would like us to get straight?) I have not heard him say differently the only dispute he came up with is that he was going to the bathroom? Last I checked you don’t need a doll to piss in the woods….what was the doll for then? Any of Daniels friends have a reason for the modified doll? Have you seen this doll and when you or your children are hanging out with good ol Danny do you all play with the doll? He is a sick bastard and I hope everyone calls the local district attorney and makes sure that this “1st time offender” gets the 6 months he is facing….put his ass in jail where he belongs!!! As for slander and ruining this good man’s name ha! If he had nothing to hide why did he take down his website, If your friends with Daniel and he has nothing to hide ask him to join this conversation I would LOVE to hear what this sick SOB has to say….and if bubba is out there waiting for a cell mate I will be the 1st one to send bubba some Vaseline for Daniels trip to jail!!!

  45. P.W. Herman on August 15th, 2011 1:51 am

    C’mon, we know it’s you. Every damage con-troll lame defense slopped up and served here is merely a fast talking BS elaboration on your TV news interview.

    “I didn’t know it was on school property, so it’s cool.” “It was ADD that made me methodically plan out my spontaneous stripping nude on the first day of school and screwing a doll I cut holes into.” “My mind has different sensitivities so you can’t hope to understand me.” “That’s so unfair.” And on and on.

    What we’re seeing here are your crashing and burning test flights for the “I’m smarter than everyone else and everyone will believe my BS” defense strategy that you’re going to use on the judge on September 2. It may have worked until last Thursday, but it’s not working now, which you seem the very last to realize.

    You’re NOT smarter than everyone else and no one is going to buy your “You can’t prove I am a perv with perv intentions cause you can’t x-ray my brain, so that proves I’m not perv” illogic.

    And keep in mind, that the story, which is now being reported internationally, is not “BLOGGER ROB TAYLOR TRASHES INNOCENT MUSIC TEACHER’S REPUTATION.” No, it’s what YOU did to trash YOUR OWN reputation, which you don’t seem to want to take any responsibility for.

    Time to face the music.

  46. Jaime Gearle on August 15th, 2011 6:22 am

    well played Mr. Herman well played ;)

  47. steve Jamison on August 15th, 2011 11:51 am

    I haven’t even seen this story published in the local newspaper yet..Danny did not agrree with the reporter..he said the police agreed with him and issued a citation..Rob Taylor is s\in South Carolina..why is he trashing people through his supposed ‘psychic” powers without even being here…and no I am not Danny..and yes Danny has not lost any students because they know that he is not a pedophile!!!

  48. steve Jamison on August 15th, 2011 11:55 am

    …and yes I am saying that Rob Taylor has embellished and trashed by insinuating that Danny was in full view of the school which is completely false…that kids were walking over the bridge and that there were others around which is completely false and misleading..Rob Taylor should stick to his “psychic” and false prophet ways in South Carolina..

  49. P.W. Herman on August 15th, 2011 12:36 pm
  50. P.W. Herman on August 15th, 2011 12:40 pm
  51. Rob Taylor on August 15th, 2011 1:00 pm

    Sorry P.W. but comments with lots of links go into moderation.

    Danny/Steve I’ve explained this a thousand times. The fact that the police couldn’t find D.B Cooper didn’t mean he wasn’t a bank robber. Rational people, looking at the facts of the case, can assume that your “escalating sexual urges” are focused on children since your act was on a device that mimic a child, on the property of an elementary school on the first day of school.

    Many people with deviant sexual urges indulge them in private. You/Danny didn’t. You’re a garden variety pervert.

  52. steve Jamison on August 15th, 2011 1:06 pm

    It has not been reported in our local Spring Hill newspaper..the Tennessean (Nashville) reports that the incident does not require Danny to register on state or national sex offender lists…it also states that Danny is not listed on any state or national sex offender lists…which means that Danny is not a pedophile..where is the trail?

  53. Loup on August 15th, 2011 1:33 pm

    this little song goes out to Danny Troll….

    Under the bridge downtown
    Is where I Fkd a doll
    Under the bridge ”
    I could not get enough
    Under the bridge ”
    Forgot about my love
    Under the bridge ”
    I gave my life away (yeah yeah yeah)
    Ooh no (no no yeah yeah)
    Here I stay yeah yeah

    Here I stay…

    thank you and good night!

  54. Rob Taylor on August 15th, 2011 1:35 pm

    So if someone robs a bank but doesn’t get caught are they not a bank robber?

  55. P.W. Herman on August 15th, 2011 1:47 pm

    Well *ahem*,”steve,” as you surely know, the local Spring Hill papers come out on Wednesday and Danny pulled his stunt last THURSDAY, so I guess we’ll have to wait until this coming Wednesday to see his mug on the front pages, huh?

    Because on LAST Wednesday, Danny was just finishing up his final touches to his master(bating) plan, making holes in dolls, selecting a towel, and everything just so, and as far as anyone knows, hadn’t yet alerted the international media yet as to his intentions.

    So check your paper on Wednesday. Then do get back to us.

    Rob, understood. If you want to delete one post, please go ahead. I was getting error messages, so I thought it was on my end.

  56. DodiaFae on August 15th, 2011 10:11 pm

    Keir – Dammit! I did mean 2′. Thanks for pointing that out. Though I think that 2″ would have been hilarious… he’d had to have gone to the ER to have that removed from… erm… I’m sure you get the idea. Hey, maybe he should try that next!

    I’ve actually seen blow-up dolls that one could get on the cheap (mainly for “bachelor party gag” purposes, but they still had the pre-made holes that would still suit the purpose, and probably be more comfortable than holes drilled into a plastic doll.)

    “Steve”, you’re a dumbass. That’s not libel or slander (and I still think you need to look up the definitions of both), that’s just me voicing my opinions about your douchery. He was fucking a child-sized doll under a bridge leading up to an elementary school that was regularly used by children and their parents. There’s no way he didn’t know that, and no way he didn’t hear them walking overhead (children on their way to school are rarely quiet about it.) And none of them were less than 300 yards from him? Just how high is that bridge?

    What Danny Torroll did showed extremely poor judgement.

    Spoken like a true pedophile defender… I’m sure you’d be saying the same thing if he’d been caught molesting/raping an actual child. And if he’s not a pedophile, please explain his choice of a toddler-sized doll?

    P.W. – I have the same suspicions… that’s why I’ve been putting quotes around the name.

  57. DodiaFae on August 15th, 2011 10:30 pm

    It has not been reported in our local Spring Hill newspaper..the Tennessean (Nashville) reports that the incident does not require Danny to register on state or national sex offender lists…it also states that Danny is not listed on any state or national sex offender lists…which means that Danny is not a pedophile..where is the trail?

    It means no such thing. And your douchtardness is showing. Well… still showing, anyway.

  58. James Martin on August 16th, 2011 12:31 am

    Doddie, r u kidding me..u r a pagan against child abuse? Can u share a little of your pagan belief system with us. If there is a trail then he is a pedophile. If there is not it is highly unlikely. Anybody who uses the language u do 2 make a point is pathetic..Explain your website 2 us miss PAGAN and learn how to respect differing opinions..

  59. James Martin on August 16th, 2011 1:01 am

    LMAO…and what is this I see on your website Doddie? Rob Taylor is partners with u..imagine that…he…he…so what kind of Pagans r u? Wiccans or Satanists? Into Pentagrams r u? R Doddie and Rob “doing it” to raise their “magical” powers for spell casting…do they sit in circles.. What dark coven is this? I’d say the great majority of Americans don’t want 2 hear your opinions..Mother Mary of God_Reflectors IN

  60. Loup on August 16th, 2011 8:54 am

    James, I’m not sure after reading your posts if you are defending the perv or just randomly attacking other peoples believes? last time I checked, Pagans don’t fly planes into buildings or blow themselves up to make a point. In fact, throughout history, I’m pretty sure they only kill the occasional virgin to assure the Fall harvest would be plentiful. It’s been years since the Pagans have done that…. to hard to find actual virgins these days. But, Druids, well don’t get me started on them, those guys are bad news…..

  61. DodiaFae on August 16th, 2011 11:54 am

    “James”/Danny (that is you, as well, isn’t it? I’m sure Rob is already comparing IP’s and will let us know…), Please explain what my beliefs have to do with you making a toddler-sized “love doll” and banging it under a bridge that is used by little children walking to school… on school property, and on the first day of school no less? Typical pedovore tactic, deflect the discussion from the original topic and start screaming “BURN THE WITCH!” Nice try, but you get a group of average citizens together and give them a choice, they’ll almost always choose to tie the pedovore to that stake instead of the witch. ;)

    Loup, ROFL. I’m in stitches over here. XD

  62. P.W. Herman on August 16th, 2011 12:24 pm

    According to at least one local news report, Danny has had at least one prior. Some kind of domestic charge. I have seen one report that says it’s from 2006. I’m sure “steve” will “coincidentally” show up here very soon with all of the details explaining everything away, so stay tuned.

    Mugshot:

    http://zwingliusredivivus.wordpress.com/2011/08/11/ok-ewww/15251812_bg1/

  63. Rob Taylor on August 16th, 2011 1:25 pm

    James/Danny – Satanist aren’t Pagans – They beleive in the Christian mythology. But It’s interesting that you pervert defenders think religious differences are OK to be judgmental about – but not a dude fucking a doll on elementary school property while school is in session. It’s almost like you’re just some degenerate seeking t deflect attention…

  64. DodiaFae on August 16th, 2011 4:01 pm

    P.W. – he looks a lot less like Andy Dick in that mugshot than in the more recent pictures… why would anyone actually choose to look like a known pervert? Oh, right…

  65. lala on August 25th, 2011 12:47 am

    You know what? Danny defenders here (aka Danny himself) can sit on it and twirl.

    That man is a dirty, demented pervert. NO ONE in their right mind should masturbate in a public place, That is a PRIVATE act, that no one else, especially small children, need to be a part of. If he wanted to whack off and that was all that was going on, he should have waited until he was done “walking his dog” and gone home like every other decent human being that’s not a dirty child molesting pervert.

    Most interesting though, we live in Spring Hill, and there is, as we speak, a group of young men who are working on getting Danny’s exact address…. so they can go to his house and beat the tar out of them. I don;t know exactly who, but it’s been in the Spring hill rumor mill for a few weeks now. Danny, lock your doors buddy.

  66. DodiaFae on August 26th, 2011 4:50 pm

    Let’s hope he stays away from children, as well…

  67. DodiaFae on August 27th, 2011 1:45 pm

    BTW,Danny/James –

    Explain your website 2 us miss PAGAN and learn how to respect differing opinions.

    I should think that my website is pretty self-explanatory. I’m against child abuse, all forms of it. My site started out as a place for Pagans to fight child abuse and the misconceptions associated with Paganism. It grew, and people of many other faiths have joined the site in support of the cause.

    As for your demand that I “respect differing opinions”, as lala suggested, you “can sit on it and twirl.” Respect is earned, and no one who holds the sort of opinions that you do is worthy of mine or anyone else’s.

    Also, calling you a douchetard is far less pathetic than defending anyone who would fuck a toddler-sized doll, be it on school property, under a bridge that is regularly used by small children on their way to school, or even in the privacy of their own home (because, let’s face it, anyone who would fuck a toddler-sized doll is still a perverted, degenerate douche and dangerous no matter where they choose to do it). If you’ve got a problem with me calling it like I see it, then, once again, you can sit on it and twirl.

  68. Amber on December 17th, 2011 1:34 am

    I know this thread is old but:

    I’ll take that pedophile and raise you one Narcissistic Personality Disorder! Look at that NPD go! Argue, argue, argue. Classic symptoms.

  69. Rob Taylor on December 17th, 2011 1:57 pm

    Yes, of course defending your view (and in this case morality) is classic narcissism. Every parent that tries to keep their kids of drugs is a narcissist, every person who stands up for their beliefs is a narcissist. The only well adjusted people are the ones with no moral compass who defend pedophiles. You’re a genius.

  70. Amber on December 18th, 2011 4:16 pm

    ROB! LOL I was taking about “Steve” and “James” aka Danny as a Narcissist. Sorry I wasn’t clear. :D

    I actually found this douche on Facebook and in his “info” section he claims to have done song writing with Sheryl Crowe, among others.

  71. Amber on December 18th, 2011 4:21 pm

    Oops, accidentally submitted post before I was done.

    What’s the word on the sentencing? I can’t find any info on it. His claim is so completely ludicrous that I can’t imagine any judge buying it or any lawyer being able to get him off the hook. ADD made him do this? Yeah, okay. Perv.

  72. Rob Taylor on December 18th, 2011 5:04 pm

    Sorry Amber I get so many defenders of pedophiles I just assume … you know the rest. You should see the comments by Sandusky defenders at my PJ Media piece. Awful.

    But I haven’t seen much about the case – I’ll look into it this week.

  73. Chris on May 20th, 2012 3:12 pm

    Amber actually, Danny has done stuff with many famous musician’s and he is a a musical genius. If you do enough research online you will find that he has also worked with Bon Jovi, Don Henley, Dan Fogleberg (spelling?) and many more. He has even played at the Rock and Roll Hall of Fame. Musically, he is very accomplished.

    I am not excusing what he did. I know him, and he is a little out there. Honestly, we can all learn a lesson from this. Danny needs therapy, and stay away from children, and the people on here, need to focus on bettering themselves, and not tearing someone else down.

  74. Rob Taylor on May 20th, 2012 5:44 pm

    When I think of musical genius I do think of Bon Jovi and Dan Fogelberg. Not Bach, not Mozart, not Led Zepplin, not Iron Maiden or Alice Cooper or Donovon – Bon Jovi. That’s musical genius.

Leave a Reply